lesnshawn, I can't tell if you bothered to read the article to which I referred. The point is that a large number of "supposed experts" examined existing technology as THEY saw it and did not find an answer which they thought was viable.
Again, could this be due to NEOM'S total lack of information
output?? They apparently were able to present the problem with adequate credibility to obtain significant funding from private parties. These are not uninterested parties. My quick "CV" was only to show that I have seen academia lead directly to market as the result of this type of 3rd party funding. And again, why would private funding be so availble if
NEOM'S technology is so perfect and understood by these parties? Academic research is cheap for corporate purposes.
Have a good evening and lets hope for good things in the near future. tommyo
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
