InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Scandle34

03/24/12 10:09 AM

#172771 RE: DZ25 #172769

you mean the SEC suit? Seeking Alpha article is extracted from it perhaps?
icon url

arvitar

03/24/12 10:17 AM

#172774 RE: DZ25 #172769

Not amazing at all. There is only one set of facts regarding what Bordynuik has said and done. These facts are publicly documented by in his own spoken and written words, and actions. It would be suprising if independent parties investigating the facts arrived at anything be nearly identical descriptions of those facts.

Whether it be the SeekingAlpha article, the SEC, litigating lawyers, or message board posters who consider what Bordynuik has said, written, and done, all parties will cover the same set of facts in their criticisms of JBI.
icon url

fourkids_9pets

03/24/12 10:39 AM

#172783 RE: DZ25 #172769

they all *mirror* each other

which is why i've been asking
since jan 4th who exactly authored
the sec's complaint >> it comes
across as *wordy* >> literally
as if *paid by the word authored*
and in no way *resembling* in style
what other complaints originated out
of the boston office of the sec

that is followed by the SA *hit piece*
a mere 8 days later >> by a well known
antagonist to the company and ceo

and now this *plaintiff* the atty firms
on the hedgie speed dial were trolling for

this latest complaint (also) with flat out
false *info* contained within >> (but again
with law suits *anything can be alleged*) >>
it's proving aspects in a court of law that matters

and is why i've taken note of which legal counsel
now surrounds JB and JBI and their *expertise* on offer

this is also why i vote for a trial >>
forensics reveals exactly who financially
benefited at each and every step of the way
when the jury gets to see exactly who was aided
and abetted by the actions of the sec and the SA blog
i doubt there will be too much sympathy for gramppy

that will be shown with DOMARK's *valuation* >>> KIDD's
*selling of shares restricted* via those certs from 2009
to the hiring of WSB >>> to the events of july 2010 ~ and the
first *sanctioned* hit piece that coincided with MM
CSTI coming in to lighten NITE's load to the hedge fund
stuck on stupid who allowed a legal short to turn abusive
just in time to see the sec's correspondence covering 33
points *now publicly disclosed* from sept 28th 2010 to JBI
make its appearance

there are no coincidences here

the rot is systemic >> the hooks are embedded *deep*
and if not revealed to all >> and *excised* will continue
unchecked to devour others >> most *others* don't have P20
and wouldn't have lasted a fraction of the time JBI has under
the *onslaught*

i also want to know why the unregulated short hedge funds
have such unlimited access and can dictate aspects
it will also be revealing to see the *chain* of command so
to speak >> of exactly who *engaged* (hedge fund/MMs'/B/Ds')

it is a question that also needs to be answered in turn


edit>> btw .. note the attys' listed out at the end (page 32)

https://viewer.zoho.com/docs/yebYdd

recognize >> beth keller >> remember when F&F were first trolling?

but first things first

commercial roll out by JBI re: P2O and what exactly that entails

2012 reveals that answer

here's to proc no 3 8k'd by mgmt >> with the clues it too will provide
for all JBII investors including erwin grampp

===
4kids
all jmo