InvestorsHub Logo

fourkids_9pets

03/21/12 6:49 PM

#172236 RE: 5dollars #172234

i have a tough time believing that
that sec complaint was actually
*authored* by a *purported* sec employee

it's easy to DD prior complaints within the
boston office and do some comparisons

there aren't any quite as >> er >> wordy
essentially stating the same *info* 20 times over
it struck me as odd from the git go >> almost as if
compensated by the word written


just another oddity in amongst a few others where
the sec and jbi and domark are concerned

==
4kids
all jmo

ponzi_implosion

03/21/12 7:03 PM

#172240 RE: 5dollars #172234

A SEC attorney used the word 'purported' in a Federal Fraud case

The company's own auditor used the words 'adverse opinion' in their audit.

The company management used the words 'We have not performed an in-depth analysis to determine if in the past undiscovered failures of internal controls exist'

Those are strong words

Rosterman

03/22/12 1:38 AM

#172270 RE: 5dollars #172234

Thanks for reminding everyone of that specious wording. Maybe there is some reason to think that there are influences biasing the prosecution of JBII by the sec.

Who here would claim that the sec is immaculate???

snow

03/22/12 12:26 PM

#172356 RE: 5dollars #172234

5dollars

I also noticed the word "purported". It suggests that the SEC does dot adopt a neutral stance.