You're responding to a post in which I made a legitimate observation and point about the company's current lack of responisveness to phone messages. All of my other posts have raised similarly legitimate questions about company revenues, performance and communication with share holders.
Fair question. What's the deal with posters who view any sort of 'critical thinking'....look it up, it's not what you think.... ......as injurious to their share holdings' pps?
I've repeatedly made the point that all public info is 'baked into the pps' any any moment. That seem to disturb some people here who insist the company is greatly undervalued. It may be, it might not be. Those who claim that it is undervalued are left to explain why the pps is not 'persuaded' by their DD.