But what about the $5.3M 2 year budget that RFMK (Mike and Tom) blew thru?
Don't you think that some accountability, some explaination should be provided given such a change at the top level?
IMO this type of fiscal action by a CEO without any explaination by the leaving CEO or the new CEO certainy does NOT HELP the company.....in fact and again IMO.....a company the size of RFMK such a depletion of such funds certainly hurts the company????
Or does RFMK management accept this as a proper business practice and they are setting up for more of the same treatment to the RFMK shareholder by a shift of CEO but yet the same RFMK characters remain in charge???