You are right, maybe I should appologize, but it does seem that you would at least partially be implying that i) the company, after setting aside almost $90 million for this transaction and only spending around $30, would allow investors to continue making money off of them; and 2) that holders who did not accept the $16 will sell them for less. Obviously things might change and you may still be proven right.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
