Replies to post #19877 on Attitude Drinks Inc. (fka ATTD)

[Rustler]

INACCURATE. IT'S called third-party contracting. I arrange such deals all the time as an attorney. The parent company is the one credited with producing, not the subcontractor. That's like saying a contractor didn't build the house, the subcontractors did. Asinine.

[JohnDunlap]

How is this any different than a car manufacturer outsourcing production of it's parts? ATTD may not manufacture this product within a facility of their own, but they are contracting another company to produce it for them. Where would you suppose they get the money to construct their own manufacturing facility? Should they sell more shares for that? Should they take another loan? Or should they contract with an established facility to produce the product for them, generate revenue, and if more feasible in the future, use those revenues to expand? Does a company not have a product unless they spend unnecessary money that they don't have to fund expansions that are not needed at this time? Does a company not have a product and not worth investing in unless they are 100% self sufficient? IMO, that would make every company(when they first started), completely worthless.

This is just my logical opinion based on the facts that have been presented and not based on emotion or any bias...

[bgry]

you are so off the mark there bigbake it's kind'a funny. O-AT-KA does produce phase III for Attitude drinks but it's done under Roy's patent...they can't produce it for themselves...they are a contract manufacturer in this case under contract to Attitude Drinks

and Roy said they can make all he needs ;-)