Semi-annual up-dates would get rid of the pot-stirrers and traders. Fine by me. This carping isn't doing the PPS any good. If I was John or Doug I'd sever as many connections to iHUB as possible. I think i'll suggest it. Fish
I do not know where you got the impression that people dont appreciate the FR's and PR's. That is all they live for.
It is the irregular issuing of them (FR's in particular) that frustrate people IMHO. we have been led to believe by trusted posters that Doug was back probably 10 days ago. in most cases last year that would have meant a FR being published within about 5 days.
I know the two things should be independent of each other (FR's could be published at any time) and I also know that this time Doug has probably got a lot more to do back here in North America, however the reports cannot take that long to write and then get approved by the board.
The only measure I am looking at at the moment is the frequency and size of the form D's which is stable.
IMHO PR's once a quarter on production would be fine with an intermediate report on field conditions - giving the back ground picture on conditions in the field. Having some set timeframes to measure YoY production against is also important IMHO as we grow out of development and into profitable company status.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
