InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

7John

03/01/12 12:37 PM

#26788 RE: Inwestor1 #26786

Thanks for the update. Maybe this whole thing will ignite a fire under their butts. We'll see.
icon url

skyesfan1

03/01/12 12:38 PM

#26789 RE: Inwestor1 #26786

Did you talk to Gandy recently? Hes not replying to emails.
icon url

Yankyfann1

03/01/12 12:44 PM

#26790 RE: Inwestor1 #26786

You just gave me a good laugh as the number one apologist for the mess created by those running PGI, not investors, not posters here.

Keep in mind, no one here "picked" at anything or anyone until AFTER we all lost 97% of our investment and AFTER 1 year of not executing a SINGLE business transaction. The majority of those who use this board to question mgmt have been long term holders, not day traders or shorts looking for a quick buck or to make a buck off ruining a legit operation. In fact, early on many of us were pushing for the success of this company, telling friends, posting on boards, all because we envisioned PGI being successful. So if I am one of those you are pointing fingers at, one of those you accuse of "picking" at the company and the individuals who run it then I'm GUILTY as charged. Its called due diligence - finding out who your entrusting your money too and questioning them when you don't believe your money is being used wisely or potentially lining the pockets of insiders.

If PGI came through with one, JUST ONE, legitimate business transaction in the last year rather than 35 promises, many would have backed off. But we'll say it for the last time, in the end, a handful of individuals posting on one of many internet based stock boards did not and can not bring a company down. Find your scapegoats somewhere else, like in Suite 1700 of the Galleria Tower I - that is if anyone is really even there anymore.

And as for "derogatory" remarks, I for one never made it personal. I stated many times that I would not call anyone I do not personally know anything about a criminal. Questioning unfulfilled business transactions and equity losses of 97% is not being derogatory.
icon url

Diggs10

03/01/12 1:16 PM

#26793 RE: Inwestor1 #26786

Mr. McZeal wasn't the problem. Robert Gandy was. So as long as Robert Gandy is still around..it will be more of the same. This is laughable.
icon url

ChitForBrains

03/02/12 2:11 AM

#26814 RE: Inwestor1 #26786

Thanks for the update. I was pondering if you or Joe were going to takeover the CEO job. I know wapsi said he would do it many many months ago (somthinh like hed the trading desk).... think he applied?