You can engage in whatever level of effort in DD you want to... or not. That's up to you.
It's not my responsibility to do it for you...
And, neither is it the company's responsibility to stoop to the level of addressing the plaintive bleatings of every lost sheep in the market...
I don't want or expect any management to spoon feed hyperventilating shareholders minute by minute... because they have a sense of urgency that means they're incapable of holding their water.
The company addressed things re Shining Tree PRECISELY in their PR in December.
If you are surprised now to find that what they said in December... mattered ? That's clearly your error... not the company's.
Clearly... you weren't being misled by the company's effort. If you read and understood what they wrote, then, there'd be no reason to feign surprise, now ?
I don't think the company can (or should try) to make up in quantity what seems it is "missing" only in the quality of shareholders effort.
If, instead, you failed to read the Dec PR, or were misled by others into thinking it "didn't matter" ? Then, the issue seems it isn't the company's communication... rather than the effort being made by others inducing purposeful error in "analysis" of what the company said ? Perhaps you should look harder at those others whose "opinions" have now been proven... less valuable...
Many here clearly roundly IGNORED what that PR said... and then were surprised to find out it actually mattered ?
Some were even demanding that the company should "put out a PR on that"... claiming they didn't... when they did already... back in December ?
Maybe it would be useful to go back and look, again, at what the opinions about that PR were... at the time ???
I find the claim that the company should put out another PR now... just to explain that the prior PR in December meant exactly what it said... wholly ridiculous.