InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

downsideup

03/01/12 2:01 AM

#114218 RE: jpp09 #114217

You can engage in whatever level of effort in DD you want to... or not. That's up to you.

It's not my responsibility to do it for you...

And, neither is it the company's responsibility to stoop to the level of addressing the plaintive bleatings of every lost sheep in the market...

I don't want or expect any management to spoon feed hyperventilating shareholders minute by minute... because they have a sense of urgency that means they're incapable of holding their water.

The company addressed things re Shining Tree PRECISELY in their PR in December.

If you are surprised now to find that what they said in December... mattered ? That's clearly your error... not the company's.

Clearly... you weren't being misled by the company's effort. If you read and understood what they wrote, then, there'd be no reason to feign surprise, now ?

I don't think the company can (or should try) to make up in quantity what seems it is "missing" only in the quality of shareholders effort.

If, instead, you failed to read the Dec PR, or were misled by others into thinking it "didn't matter" ? Then, the issue seems it isn't the company's communication... rather than the effort being made by others inducing purposeful error in "analysis" of what the company said ? Perhaps you should look harder at those others whose "opinions" have now been proven... less valuable...

Many here clearly roundly IGNORED what that PR said... and then were surprised to find out it actually mattered ?

Some were even demanding that the company should "put out a PR on that"... claiming they didn't... when they did already... back in December ?

Maybe it would be useful to go back and look, again, at what the opinions about that PR were... at the time ???

I find the claim that the company should put out another PR now... just to explain that the prior PR in December meant exactly what it said... wholly ridiculous.



icon url

show-da-money

03/01/12 8:00 AM

#114226 RE: jpp09 #114217

And a simple liInk on the website would cure a lot.
I don't understand how we are all missing the value?
Downside keeps making the value sound like something perceived.
I find it far less complicated, my account is either profitable or it is not.

Having tons of cash tied up for years with the price being less now than this time last year is not value.
I could have had this money working in a place where value is not a concept.
I keep hanging on here, but it gets harder everyday. I could use some of my cash back in my pocket but prices are just always too low to cash out after 4 years of waiting.. Most are red on this stock, green is where the value is. Imo
icon url

jimHorse

03/01/12 9:56 AM

#114235 RE: jpp09 #114217

No one can sincerely defend every move SRSR has made in last year.



I agree. If a SRSR shareholder doesn't have ANY concerns about how Nemegosenda has been handled over the past few years, they are either not being sincere or they are blissfully ignorant.
icon url

sarshee

03/01/12 11:00 AM

#114237 RE: jpp09 #114217

AMEN!!!!!!!!

browndawg
icon url

gold 1625

03/01/12 1:31 PM

#114276 RE: jpp09 #114217

It really is our responsibility to google all that you mentioned, but really only if your going to post on message boards more then your opinion. I bought SRSR knowing it would take a great deal of time, either I get to enjoy the fruits of my DD or my grandkids will partake of the fruit. GLTA