wd...I provided some information related to whom I am for one simple purpose; to establish a certain amount of credibility. You are the one that has chosen to take what I have posted, which are simply facts and public announcements that have bearing on the likely success or failure of CLYW, and make it about me. I have never attacked anyone on this board save questioning your credibility because we have no means to gauge it against what you say.
And no, it doesn't sting at all what you say, you're just some guy getting angry because my opinion and the facts I present don't agree with yours. If everyone on this forum agreed all the time it wouldn't be very useful or entertaining.
And incidentally, most of the influential people...in fact all that I am aware of...are not anonymous. How could they gain credibility if they obfuscated their identities out of fear. In fact, I think it's pretty humorous that you attack me and say that I have no balls, meanwhile you continue to hide behind your pseudonym.
Incidentally, it shows tremendous creativity and class to attack someone's screen name. It is so incredibly original. But in my mind it simply indicates another obvious truth; that on the playing field of real information, facts, figures and competitive intelligence you have nothing substantive to offer and thus resort to the playground style name calling and insults.
I wonder, has this served you well all your life?
-S
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
