Replies to post #102310 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[fourkids_9pets]

To think that JD and ***ANOTHER*** person would attempt to draw sympathy by using cancer as a way to deflect and ***ENABLE*** .... that would be DISGUSTING.

==
and who would that be?

let me reiterate >> if the implication (again) is me
i have zero knowledge re: *cancer* >> *jd* >> *deflection*
or *enabling* >> dots need to be connected a little more
specifically for me to comment which is why i asked for clarity
out of the original *post*

as for disgusting >> i've pretty much seen it all when it comes
to the OTC over the past 5 years

the money *cleared* via 2 runs by x entity/s was never unique to EXPH
sadly that *dot* wasn't connected by me until *after* the 2nd run
done in EXPH in sept 2009 <edit>> and the *turn* was underway>

again *ACC441* >> i look forward to all revelations >> particularly
if Expo's mgmt committed securities fraud with x entity/s >>
there would be zero reason for JD to withhold *specifics*
including identities >> time will tell what comes to pass

based on TA's input from MAY 2011 >> i will withhold judgment until
the FACTS are presented and ruled upon by those who have the
authority to pursue this matter (if that is the route it goes)

==
4kids
all jmo