The CEO states they were only reimbursed for expenses, and not compensated for their time or work. They aren't on the payroll of winning brands meaning, they aren't employees of the company, and therefore any post targeting them should be considered off topic.
Thank you Tib! I never questioned whether the company was doing anything that was illegal or not. I have never seen anything that would lead me to believe that. They have always seemed to have their I's dotted and T's crossed in that arena. As far as the shareholders in question..I would suggest they research what the SEC says about this affiliation and posting on a public forum for this stock. Simply for their own information and protection.
It is nice to have this all cleared up from the company's perspective.
Funny how relevant questions are labeled as "allegations of improprietary" by the CEO. No wonder relevant questions go unanswered for so long around here because the CEO himself fuels the "us and against them" bs mentality with words like "accusers" and "lazy" only being the latest label for anyone who questions what's brought the share price down to historic lows.
I wonder what "or any legitimate cost" covers???
Is scup/dirtydave's time/effort considered "or any legitimate cost"???
Is it just me, or did anyone else notice he said a whole lot of nothing? Those saying or thinking "Case Closed", need to re-read the email. I will address each of the above bold statements in order in which they are bold....
1. The financial arrangement is not straight forward for those who are paying attention to detail.
2. Of course they are not on payroll, they are paid on a "per show" basis/under the table...
3."(not paid for advice, posting, video uploads)"...sooooo.....they are paid for doing the Promo shows? (Like I said)
4. ("Their enthusiasm for the product of which they are partial owners as shareholders is their motive")....So like I have said for the past few months...The "greater good" is not their motive, it's the PPS.....Let's see this enthusiasm if the company chooses to do a R/S...
5. ("they are not even fully reimbursed as they have from time to time waived or deferred some reimbursement.")....So at least they have the decency to turn down money when they know they are being overpaid....and/or telling Eric to pay them later when the company is in a better position to pay up......For example; "Hey Eric, that was a great showing today. Don't worry about paying us today Ok. We'll wait until you dilute the other shareholders tomorrow."
6. ("No shares been provided to them as compensation").....OK Soooooooo....MONEY/CASH/MULA? Come on I thought the financial arrangement was suppose to be straightforward?
So again....not so straightforward....Notice he didn't "STOCK or CASH"? So basically Eric admits Cash was provided to Just A Ant...and this is straight from the CEO himself. Wow....I wonder how much? 5 stacks? Ant, do you care to confirm? I believe that is the amount you bragged about a while back...right?
P.S....This matter could have been the easiest Memo he has ever wrote. But he chose to, once again, make it more difficult to understand to the intelligent reader....He could of said, "They are not paid any money (or shares) for anything other than being reimbursed for travel and food costs".....That would of ended it! But no....he decides to use his normal subliminal messages which most don't catch....But those who do catch are labeled Lazy and such...lol