Replies to post #182740 on Winning Brands Corporation (WNBD)

[Tiburon99]

well that settles it for me. to sum up.
they were reimbursed expense, not compensated for time or effort.

for promoting the product, not the stock.

fully disclosed
QED

[lbdave]

The CEO states they were only reimbursed for expenses, and not compensated for their time or work. They aren't on the payroll of winning brands meaning, they aren't employees of the company, and therefore any post targeting them should be considered off topic.

[Serenity]

Thank you Tib! I never questioned whether the company was doing anything that was illegal or not. I have never seen anything that would lead me to believe that. They have always seemed to have their I's dotted and T's crossed in that arena. As far as the shareholders in question..I would suggest they research what the SEC says about this affiliation and posting on a public forum for this stock. Simply for their own information and protection.

It is nice to have this all cleared up from the company's perspective.

:-)

[lightbeam]

That ends that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Have a good week end!!!!!!!!!! Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Long Island Andy]

Thank goodness. That puts that witch hunt to bed!

JMO

[littlefeets]

Thank you CEO Lehner,

As a point of interest for the board readership in general, the “accusers” do not ask the company for information to clarify concerns prior to making their accusations. Instead, they make others do their work for them, so that the accusers can focus on the easy and lazy task of merely making insinuations.

easy and lazy

easy and lazy

easy and lazy

[Romak3]

B..............S

Go WNBD!! To the moon and beyond!! :)

Buy more of this gem! She's going blow!!!! Or is it he?

What ever! Just get your freak on!! pfft

[Belgianshareholder]

YUP - CASE CLOSED, DOOG ET ALL! :-D :-D

Thanks, Tib! YOU ARE THE MAN!

GOOOOOOOOOOOO WNBD!!!

[doogdilinger]

Funny how relevant questions are labeled as "allegations of improprietary" by the CEO. No wonder relevant questions go unanswered for so long around here because the CEO himself fuels the "us and against them" bs mentality with words like "accusers" and "lazy" only being the latest label for anyone who questions what's brought the share price down to historic lows.

I wonder what "or any legitimate cost" covers???

Is scup/dirtydave's time/effort considered "or any legitimate cost"???

"The financial arrangement is straightforward – they determine in advance the cost of their travel, accommodation, meals, supplies or any legitimate cost and submit the details for prior approval"

[ActivClient]

(1)The financial arrangement is straightforward – they determine in advance the cost of their travel, accommodation, meals, supplies or any legitimate cost and submit the details for prior approval. Reimbursement is provided and recorded in the company’s records in connection with the event. Documentation is retained for internal audit purposes, including receipts, show information, etc. (2)They are not on payroll and are (3)not paid for advice, posting, video uploads, etc. (4)Their enthusiasm for the product of which they are partial owners as shareholders is their motive. In a strict sense, (5)they are not even fully reimbursed as they have from time to time waived or deferred some reimbursement. Their status as shareholders and their occasional demonstrations have been well known and appreciated by iHub readers from the outset. (6)No shares been provided to them as compensation for this or anything else. Winning Brands reports publicly all shares that it provides as compensation, in its filings with OTC Markets.

Is it just me, or did anyone else notice he said a whole lot of nothing? Those saying or thinking "Case Closed", need to re-read the email. I will address each of the above bold statements in order in which they are bold....

1. The financial arrangement is not straight forward for those who are paying attention to detail.

2. Of course they are not on payroll, they are paid on a "per show" basis/under the table...

3."(not paid for advice, posting, video uploads)"...sooooo.....they are paid for doing the Promo shows? (Like I said)

4. ("Their enthusiasm for the product of which they are partial owners as shareholders is their motive")....So like I have said for the past few months...The "greater good" is not their motive, it's the PPS.....Let's see this enthusiasm if the company chooses to do a R/S...

5. ("they are not even fully reimbursed as they have from time to time waived or deferred some reimbursement.")....So at least they have the decency to turn down money when they know they are being overpaid....and/or telling Eric to pay them later when the company is in a better position to pay up......For example; "Hey Eric, that was a great showing today. Don't worry about paying us today Ok. We'll wait until you dilute the other shareholders tomorrow."

6. ("No shares been provided to them as compensation").....OK Soooooooo....MONEY/CASH/MULA? Come on I thought the financial arrangement was suppose to be straightforward?

Neither has the company provided stock in consideration for domain addresses, nor been placed into an improper situation with respect to domain names.

So again....not so straightforward....Notice he didn't "STOCK or CASH"? So basically Eric admits Cash was provided to Just A Ant...and this is straight from the CEO himself. Wow....I wonder how much? 5 stacks? Ant, do you care to confirm? I believe that is the amount you bragged about a while back...right?

P.S....This matter could have been the easiest Memo he has ever wrote. But he chose to, once again, make it more difficult to understand to the intelligent reader....He could of said, "They are not paid any money (or shares) for anything other than being reimbursed for travel and food costs".....That would of ended it! But no....he decides to use his normal subliminal messages which most don't catch....But those who do catch are labeled Lazy and such...lol