InvestorsHub Logo

louisa

02/24/12 2:12 PM

#182666 RE: doogdilinger #182665

No blog on this, will Scup and Dave weigh in on this situation? this board would be dead if not for the questions by the folks who have a clue about what is going on. Best.

Long Island Andy

02/24/12 2:18 PM

#182667 RE: doogdilinger #182665

Simply put, much ado about nothing.

JMO

lbdave

02/24/12 2:41 PM

#182671 RE: doogdilinger #182665

I edited it to make sure that it would be understood that there is a difference in being compensated and being reinbursed.

As for your statement to what knowledge I have..... I have no idea if they are being reimbursed for expenses, compensated for their time, or any thing else protaining to scup or dave. I will go on record saying I do appreciate their efforts, and if fair monetary compensation was given I have no problem with it.

ActivClient

02/24/12 3:28 PM

#182682 RE: doogdilinger #182665

I appreciate everyone continuing with questioning the two employees on this message board. I was reinstated today by our great Admins due to everyone now realizing that working for a company while posting on it's stock message board makes you subject to questioning in regards to financials, payments, or anything monetary. It is a given fact that I, along with many other posters/investors want to learn more...straight from the employees, vice the outsiders like myself. So if they do not respond to our questions, it is because either one, they ARE being compensated for attending these product promo's and choose not to admit it, or two, they signed NDA's and they are still being compensated for these product promo's. I don't expect them to work for free, but I would like to know if they are being paid...as it changes the dynamics of how one should review/read their post's or opinions. It would also speak volumes to the state of the company and how they may choose to operate in the near future. What if Eric only cares about Scup and Dirty's finances? We all know that Eric knows that they lost money in this stock in large sums, so what if he is compensating them in shares or cash to pay them back over time until he can build his company for the rest of us. hey...So even if he R/S's or increases the Authorized share count, at least his two "gunslingers" are being taken care of. Maybe this is why he can sleep at night after watching this ride down from .024 to .0002 on the bid(soon)

P.S. This is equivalent to when Just A Ant was compensated in shares for holding the WNBD Domain names hostage until Eric the CEO was forced to pay him.

Thanks again Admin.

lightbeam

02/24/12 3:53 PM

#182687 RE: doogdilinger #182665

That is not what it says. Ya better read it again and they are not promoting a security. They are promoting a product. Just like I do when telling or showing someone how the product works. I invested here because I like the product.

Section 17b, Securities Act of 1933

"It shall be unlawful for any person, by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by the use of the mails, to publish, give publicity to, or circulate any notice, circular, advertisement, newspaper, article, letter, investment service, or communication which, though not purporting to offer a security for sale, describes such security for a consideration received or to be received, directly or indirectly, from an issuer, underwriter, or dealer, without fully disclosing the receipt, whether past or prospective, of such consideration and the amount thereof." (15 U.S.C. § 77q(b).)