Replies to post #1292 on Santeon Group Inc (SANT)

[pugdog]

yankeeace, read the last 1291 post, the questions you ask are many and detailed response is required - many of the prior postings are comprehensive

update: dmoi profits on the "service" - being software which includes intellectual property, namely biometric capability

2nd update: Also, do not assume that expert level knowledge of biometrics is necessary to profit from biometric patents

this isn’t an internet site – this is a wireless gambling client/server side technology invoking advertising messages

Again, do not ASSUME that dmoi will be raped on the deal(s) that occur – look at the software service industry – and you will realize the basic demand for these applications.

...by the way how do you think yahoo and google make most of their money???

[goosemeister]

yankeeace,

here are some milestones that diamondi should pass before there is user feedback (do not take what i say as gospel, though; your own dd may yield different results; it would be wise to note that each of these milestones should result in substantial share price activity):

1. financing (financing is crucial; diamondi needs money to purchase the apparati, grease the bearings for casino testing, etc.)

2. pagcor (there is no timeline as it relates to domestic business, but management did mention that there should be late summer activity regarding overseas gaming)

3. purchase of pdas

4. further regulations from gaming board(s) (i think that these regulations will have more to do with the companies that will be offering wireless gaming, for example: what will the gaming commissions, state and federal governments require of the hardware, software, and business interactions?)

5. obviously, the agreements and contracts must happen before enrollment in the casinos

these are but a handful of possible milestones that should or must occur before the results from public testing will be received. each of these should move the price per share to points that will test our desire to remain longs. i'd be highly surprised if any of us hold all or even most of our shares by the time that public usage information is culled. if it reaches the part of the journey where the casinos are quantifying success in the public venue, we should be at a share price multiples above the current price. as much as i'd like to think that i'll stick it out, if this stock reaches "X times Average Price of Purchased Shares," i will be considering my exits. remember, "bulls make money. bears make money. pigs get slaughtered."

[goosemeister]

"casinos will likely rape them when it comes to gaming profits since the casino takes on all the gaming risks. so where does DMOI profit again?"

first, i just wanted to say that i really hate the use of the word "rape" in this instance. sorry. but anyway...

what will move diamondi to statospheric levels are not the specifics of the contracts with the casinos -- but the contracts themselves. if wireless gaming is wildly popular during the testing phase, and we should not assume that it will be (never assume the best possible situation when buying speculative stocks), then diamondi will have contract leverage. such leverage could then result in diamondi receiving a portion of derived revenue. if the testing period does not yield greatly extended gaming revenue, diamondi will then have less leverage for the contract agreements. it is just my opinion, but diamondi would likely then receive remuneration for usage regardless of revenue.