InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Acc441

02/16/12 9:17 PM

#102122 RE: fourkids_9pets #102119

No factual information contained in your post or any other post regarding JD and his cronies having not sold a single share.


to suggest that facts exist that prove JD never sold a share is of course..... *enabling*


"Could have asked Mgmt".. you are asking folks to ask the insiders of a non-reporting pump and dump scheme questions and then believe the answers? And this is "DD"?? I would call it *enabling*



"certs were visible in offices"...... LOL and so were the con men who occupied these "offices".... simply additional *enabling*


"there is no gray here".... I disagree.... *enabling* is ALL about twisting everything into a gray area and painting a positive picture out of a failing insolvent company while insiders and *enablers* dump shares.

"each person is responsible for their own DD"... and the *enablers* that attempt to pass *conspiracy* theories and innuendo off as DD should keep it to themselves.... it is nothing more than *enabling*.. and quite disgusting.
icon url

99leadballoons

02/17/12 8:52 AM

#102131 RE: fourkids_9pets #102119

then when it was posted
that nope certs were clearly visible in *offices*


I could post that I saw receipts for the sales. Would that make it true then? Is that the burden of proof? Pretty silly.

Oh and my track record of predicting mgmt has been far more accurate than the so-called "boots"