InvestorsHub Logo

drkazmd65

02/15/12 11:34 AM

#55403 RE: sirhaggus #55402

Well - I must admit,... after reading the Judge's response to Calypso's motion to reconsider - he does seem to have a non-nonsense approach to the BS he has seen.

Well handled on his part.

Now - we'll just have to see how the Receiver proceeds.

Eli's Gone

02/15/12 11:53 AM

#55409 RE: sirhaggus #55402

Is anyone else having a problem with page 3 of the Motion Denied document loading?

https://viewer.zoho.com/docs/uFiHc

SeagrassInvestments

02/15/12 11:54 AM

#55410 RE: sirhaggus #55402

Bravo! Good for the judge! The judge has made the position clear (NO nonsense) and I feel very confident in the direction that the judge had given and think the appointment of a receiver is in the shareholders best interests - thank you for sharing this.

Looking forward to seeing the well deserved maximum benefits for the shareholders that have suffered this past management for so long.