Replies to post #54904 on Sunergy, Inc. (fka SNEY)

[scubastevemd]

Sure at that point they were, but we really have to wait on current Q's to give us a current picture and not look back 12 months. I do not drink Kool Aid either, but I'll wait for the facts before I call this one way or another. While skepticism is always prudent in pennies unless you have no faith at all in mgts. ability or honesty you wait for the facts. Sure by then it could be too late, but you have to pay to play. Just too early to tell until the current Q's tell us the current state of affairs. Now if they drag these on down the road to hide bad news that's another story, but they are getting there slowly, but slowly.

[risk on]

That post just now has nothing to do with the fact that you stated no revenue shown, and those who say sney is generating revenues are " misleading" people. The point, Mikey, its you who are using a filing for a time period a year ago to make those claims. The dredges were not even in SL and in the waters in q1 for all intents and purposes. You know that. So why make statements to the effect that people who say sney is generating revenue are liars because the filing says otherwise, when the filing has really nothing to do w contemporary events.

[stokes1]

You obviously don't understand the timeframe for when this Q covers. You're talking about it as if its in the present, but its not. It's actually very dated information.

A lot can happen between then and now, exercise some patience. You really should have expected this. Be happy they are being honest.

Perhaps a CE penny isn't the place for you if you know them all too well.