The board is "controlled" by the mods, who have to answer to admin. Mods can delete things but other mods can restore them. Admin can override mods at any time and their actions are final. Posters have a right to appeal anything done by any mod.
You and any other Bebevco supporter has the exact same right and ability to express your thoughts about the company and stock as anyone else. Nobody is controlling you with regard to your ideology. The problem you are running into is that your "bashers" are posting about the ugly reality of the stock and you don't have anything real to counter those posts with. If you want to get frustrated and angry, you ought to direct your anger at the company you are fighting for because they are 'sending you into battle' without ammunition. You complain about the "truth" not getting out, but the problem is that the facts don't support your "truth".
I don't know why you refuse to accept the real explanation for why your posts get deleted or limited or why you get banned. It's not whether or not you are "nice to bashers", A post that consists of nothing but critiquing other people's posting or talking about yourself, rather than addressing the actual content of their posts or the topic at hand, is a violation of TOS.
You gave a great example here, just yesterday. Your post #648 consists of nothing but you talking about yourself. And the very next post is you replying to yourself and talking about you talking about yourself. Then you launch into your "who do you trust" rap that you repeat endlessly, but which is completely irrelevant. It's OK here because it's not a stock board, but on a stock board, it violates TOS. Not because is disagrees with "bashers", but because it's off topic. The topic of a stock message board is the stock and the company, not the posters on the board and not yourself. Plain and simple. If you continue to violate the TOS in that manner you get limited and eventually banned. It has zero to do with your ideology.
No basher asks you to trust them and no trust is required to look at hard numbers or website links that provide information. Numbers and weblinks don't change depending on who posts the links, so you don't need to "trust" or "believe" the person posting them. When the CEO asks you to trust him without being willing to provide any verification, it requires trust and belief that the CEO is telling the truth. You can "trust" and believe whoever you want, that's your choice, just realize that what some people claim can be verified and what others claim cannot. One of those things requires "trust" and belief and the other doesn't. Pretending that "truth" which isn't supported by anything but your faith in someone's word is the same thing as "truth" supported by objective, verifiable facts, is nonsense. The most twisted part of this is that the person in whom you have placed your faith is the very same person responsible for the facts you choose to ignore.
You are choosing to ignore what can be proven and choosing to believe that which cannot be proven and they come from the same source. That, my friend, is the definition of delusion.