InvestorsHub Logo

unevilfavouredness

02/10/12 1:56 PM

#8831 RE: Tavycal #8829

I thought all pinks were covered by that law Clinton signed that basically said that any forward looking statement is really not a statement, but rather an idea about what could be a statement if someone choses to look at it as one, but doesn't nessisarily constitute one; like the "i didn't have sexual relations with that woman"; while true, was false, and likewise, any emotion that is limited to the written english language is not a statement, but rather a fragment of an ever growing and never ceasing incomplete thought that at any time can be changed in meaning due to the author's perceived context; unless they are a republican; then what they say actually has to mean something relative to what they feel and are willing to stand by as a statement that they tehmselves actually made.