InvestorsHub Logo

downsideup

02/08/12 7:56 PM

#54845 RE: longhorn 53 #54843

Looks to me like there isn't any thing much to see, yet, that would enable telling how this will play out. How it plays out now is entirely a function of the choices and decisions of the receiver, and without knowing what they're looking at or thinking ? No way to know if they'll even take the value seriously, or just do what they need to do to "resolve the problem" from the perspective of the court and the SEC.

It is, at least, the first time EVER that CLYW has been properly in control of an entity that you can reasonably expect will act in good faith.

So, thus far, it looks like the only winner is Delaware... and what that will turn out to mean for shareholders isn't at all clear, yet.

The wording was... open ended enough... that it could mean pretty much anything in terms of an end result, leaving it entirely to the judgment and discretion of the receiver. That it's being addressed in Delaware, now... is a whole lot better than not... and beyond that, we wait to see what decisions get made... and how long it will take for them to get made.









Jmon

02/08/12 7:58 PM

#54846 RE: longhorn 53 #54843

I'm with litton
Going after past infringers was never going to happen...
We are now at least gonna see what the patent is worth. The patent supressment is done...
It may be what the opposition wanted the whole time

litton51

02/08/12 9:10 PM

#54855 RE: longhorn 53 #54843

Truly happy? Of course not. But I see no better outcome to this criminal circus. If you think we were ever going to see a dime under former management, please send me a case of whatever you're drinking.