My issue isn't and has never been with your position. Or the opinions behind them. My issue is how you respond to requests for proof of your numerous claims. If you want to be taken seriously, here's a tip. If you make a claim about predicting price action, be able to support it with fact. Just so you can get an idea of how it looks to us, here is the series of events that made up this conversation:
You: I predicted the close exactly, I wrote it down earlier, told you so
I & others request an explanation....
You: my dd and technical analysis
I ask for details...
You: I would be glad to but I don't want to share here.
Me: pm me
You: I don't have pm
Me: here is my e-mail
You send a bunch of spam and an e-mail telling me to go f*ck myself, then sidestep my question here with info I already had. I was asking if you were talking ema or sma and lookback period of your channel, not the period of your moving average. I can read just fine.
Do you see how this looks to me and understand why it's annoying? You made a big claim, I asked for proof, then you made a series of excuses I gave solutions for and finally told me to go f*ck myself and spammed me. Do you see this as the activity of someone I should revere or show any respect for? You want respect, earn it. Plenty of bears on this forum that get respect.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
