I just became aware that a hearing in the Anchor Litigation Case was held on Sept 19, 2011. I have read the hearing transcript and Judge Block concludes the hearing by stating he will decide the Case shortly.
It therefore may be too late to intervene in the Anchor Litigation Case if Judge Block decides the FDIC-R or JPM is the real party in interest. The other option before him - as stated by the DOJ - is to rule that it is ambiguous who the real party in interest is and that extrinsic evidence is required.
If Judge Block rules that extrinsic evidence is required then this will be our opportunity to intervene.
I really enjoyed reading the hearing transcript and found Judge Block to be a rather polite and interesting Judge - who asked a lot of questions. Here is an interesting excerpt in our favor:
" THE COURT: Okay, that's important. We'll
get to that in a minute. Before I go on, I must ask a
question about the Bankruptcy proceedings. Why should
I look at any of them? What authority do they have
over this Court? We're enforcing our judgment. "