InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

aredrooster

02/02/12 8:58 PM

#113178 RE: downsideup #113177

it is all just endless banter to kill time. Coulda, woulda, shoulda, until there is a rise in share price to bring real interest to the company. As for the prop acq., who knows? Could be mineral, could be southernmost point for entry to the field for all other miners. Location, location.
icon url

sometimes_right

02/03/12 12:03 AM

#113186 RE: downsideup #113177

I've VERY LITTLE respect for those engaged in the character assassination of posters stating FACTS and dismissing the "offensive" remarks as some sort of conspiracy effort. I was merely bolstering dmbao's statement about "many people can build and operate a mine," with the fact my brother-in-law is qualified as a Mining Engineer, although I neither know dmbao (or any other iHub poster) personally nor usually agree with his/her viewpoints. So while there may be a group effort by some to control SRSR's trading range - I'm not part of it, if it does exist.

Also, when has it become a crime to wonder about the educational background of the CEO of the company one has been invested in for going on five years? I didn't assign positive or negative value to higher education... it was several other posters whom interjected their perceived negativity into the matter - whether it be they are for or against academic achievement. Seems a few folks are a bit touchy about education, or the lack of it, and begin attacking everything in sight!

Furthermore if you insist upon a conspiratorial plan, I'll provide you with one. I've been invested in SRSR for going on five years (underwater for most of the time) and I am tired of seeing the PPS languishing in the low pennies & want the company to acquire the financing to move forward - as that's the action plan shareholders voted for months ago. Or, are long-time investors never allowed to be frustrated??? Ohhhh... pardon me for conflicting with your "reality" by mentioning that I'm "frustrated;" however when even several BANKRUPTCY stocks have provided much better money-making opportunities over the past several years when compared to SRSR, I think it's a natural reality for some investors to become frustrated about this stock's performance (except for the handful of FLIPPERS that have boxed in the trading of SRSR). I'd much rather talk about more pleasant things but management has not provided us with any recent insight about matters - so all we can go by are several missed milestones that were anticipated because of previous company PR statements. The company should only PR factual accomplishments... not wishful milestones which cannot be met in the time frames alluded to... if not specifically stated. IMO

I'm limited to 1 post per day on this MB so don't expect a quick reply....