Fortunately, odds are that will happen...
Otherwise... why would you think this POS wouldn't be de-listed the day after the judge rules, if that means every last potential for it to be made legitimate, again, is being lost... and, the more, given the history and its sources ?
Turrini's had four years to "fix it"... and in that time has not once bothered to make the effort... although he's made at least one overt attempt in that time to rob the company blind for his personal benefit. Given the persistence of the patterns apparent here ? I'll gladly bet that pattern is also one that will repeat... if shareholders are clueless enough to allow it to repeat. That a minority of shareholders are willingly rooting Turrini on... only suggests to me that they're a part of the crowd who intend to be among the looters if Turrini succeeds in taking the whole thing down...