Replies to post #24520 on Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[Skribe]

Stand's for inventor John Prevost. Refers to a Patent Application 20040087808.
Input # here under public pair to view info on the Patent Application which ended in Final Rejection and Abandonment. Never became a Patent. I believe the defendants tried to claim GERS 858 Patent was identical and obvious to the Prevost application and should also be declared invalid as was Prevost's. Yet it is proven not so and the method and process of the 858 Patent is very different.
By comparing the method and process of both you will see why GreenShift is right and the defendant's are wrong. The method's differ and the 858 is successful because so.
http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/status/index.jsp
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=69870639
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=69957579
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=69815040
some old post's for reference.