Replies to post #48948 on Micro Imaging Technology Inc (MMTC)

[frontloading]

janey, erased a name or two ( and a few name letters) for potential legalities, response of emails verbatim. i try to be factual and unbiased, let the chips fall where they may... From: Ronald <[e-mail]>
Date: December 30, 2011 4:01:53 PM CST
To: Michael W rennan <[e-mail]>, ictor A ollander <[e-mail]>
Subject: Fwd: mmtc

Michael,

I receive this e-mail from an EPIC Shareholder and was surprised to find you made a press release without our discussing it before hand as you said you would. Your representations and statements were and are not factual, except for the fact you rejected the idea of an exclusive license agreement which I submitted to you for discussion purposes and for which you arbitrarily published a press release that misrepresented what I was suggesting. I think it would be appropriate for you to put out a press release stating that certain portions were in error but that MIT had rejected the exclusive license agreement.

onald S ucker

Begin forwarded message:

> Subject: mmtc
> Date: December 29, 2011 9:59:56 PM PST
> To: [e-mail]
>
> mr tucker..i am a shareholder and purchased shares with assurance of mmtc agreement as stated in epic annual report 2011. i noticed today that mmtc has stated that no agreement was finalized and deal is tabled. i find this to be quite troubling as i had expected epic to become a significant mit1000a distributor and disappointed with substantial revenue loss. could you please set the record straight? thanks,

onald ucker
[e-mail]