I think there are a lot of people who are very genuinely surprised at how tenacious a lot SRSR shareholders are.
The "verbal attack" methods used to generate a "shake" just aren't working any more... too many holders have seen it all done, already, and know the script. Then, the last couple short attacks using the market were basically expensive efforts that had shorts subsidize the buyers, that the market just shrugged off... and accepted as shorts offering "cheap shares" on sale to be bought by the lucky ones from the shorts and not much else. My analysis says the shorts that have tried that tactic have been losing as many or more of those battles as they've won in the last year or so...
I agree with you that holders are holding... and the lack of volume that results from holders holding... just isn't a problem at all... for holders. It's also silly to claim it is "buying" or "selling" that ISN'T happening when the market participants are "on strike"... and are simply not willing to participate in the game being "produced" for them...
If you want to see more volume... you're going to have to see a higher price...
The lack of shareholders willing to participate as traders in the market that is being offered to them now... is only a problem... for others... who depend on sustaining the "perception" of volume, at least. Myself... I don't find that there is a shortage of other stocks in the market... many of which I'm willing to trade... while I hold my SRSR shares.
My opinion is that the market doesn't work here... because holders simply aren't willing to sell any shares at current prices... Wily catfish are not taking that stink bait...
That is certainly true of me...
My "benefit" isn't influenced by it one way or the other... since "holding" SRSR until we see the market finally better recognizing the value we recognize... is a vastly better option than trading shares at prices well below value... while risking not being able to get them back at anything like that value we expect will be recognized, eventually...