From a legal perspective of "wordsmanship" perhaps, but if experienced GERSers like us required a detailed analysis by the Guru Skunk, what chance did the average Joe have in getting that right? What chance did they have of not assuming that 30% of the industry was now under license? Your statement that 10 of 10 would assume that 30% of the industry was under license answers that question -- none. My point is that it was the 30% figure that caused the run up and the realization that it didn't mean what many thought it meant that has precipitated the sell-off. Curious what today brings.
That SkunK info WAS pretty persuasive! But Still, my POINT is That ALL this is retroactive to 30 September 2011. Greenshift could PR EVENTS, but not 4th Quarter income projections ETC. ahead of the 4TH Quarterly report for 2011. If they put out a PR saying things were going great...Blaa Blaa Blaa, SOMEBODY would feel impelled to Challenge That as a LIE!! And cite imaginary (Historical) figures. MOO
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
