It seems to be a favorite tactic - to announce that EEGC is traveling to someplace exotic to "finalize" the terms of the JV, but then never specifically announcing that the negotiations were successful, that the JV exists or what the terms of the JV are. Later PRs about other projects then go on to discuss the JV as if it HAD been finalized and funded.
The Sure Capital "funding" of $180 million is a great example. EEGC even posted the "contract" in an 8K. Of course, there was no funding.
I challenged anyone to point to the 8K announcing the successful completion of either the TXO JV, or the NBD JV. Nobody has been able to. The best I got was a lame "the company is currently defining the content of the contract"
and still, that poster would not acknowledge that the JV did not in fact exist, insisting that "the 8k says otherwise." He never did say what 8K he was referring to.