InvestorsHub Logo

Eli's Gone

01/18/12 7:52 PM

#53899 RE: longhorn 53 #53898

That would be nice to know and go towards verifying the settlement terms...also need the company to address the fact that nothing has changed in the satellite patent assignment at this point...

HighRider

01/18/12 8:31 PM

#53904 RE: longhorn 53 #53898

I don't see why they would need to file anything concerning the foreign rights since the USPTO has no jurisdiction over the foreign assignments.

Visnusahasranama

01/18/12 11:46 PM

#53908 RE: longhorn 53 #53898

Should also state

The settlement vacates the $117 million, December 8, 2006 judgment in favor of Drago Daic. Under the new, final agreement, all prior agreements are void.

downsideup

01/19/12 5:08 PM

#53935 RE: longhorn 53 #53898

Making those sorts of assumptions re CLYW is, generally, an inordinately bad idea...