I wish that you were right. I do not think so. Compare that language "using" to the language in the Q3 which was "licensed". To change from licensed to using I do not believe is coincidental. If you are right then there must be a settlement agreement to license the infringers?
Olie77, I have to think you are taking the right view of the 30% claim. Any other reading would take a lot of convoluted conjecture as to "Why" muddle the claim (Which obviously has resulted from those taking the minimum choice rather than the plain meaning and choice of wording used.) People playing by Chess Rules when the game is straight Checkers.MOO