I think that it has been shown that the other companys have shortfalls to there Dazzer/ Dazzlers. Either they do not work as advertised or they have to be used at a distance to prevent permanent blindness. We have a viable product. THE problem is that the company is run so wretchedly, weather it is a personal piggy bank that is funded through shareholder generosity or its a hobby is what we have been shown. I know guys they do everything outside of the law. They are very industrious. I have counseled a couple of them that if they were to be as industrious within the confines of the establishment they would make more money and be able to sell the enterprise as a viable business when the time came. Unsure if that works here or not. If they have a dazer that is in fact operational I have to stretch my thought process understanding why they can not get these out into the market. The idea and what we have seen is fantastic as a new invention. We have gone on about Taser and its mercurial rise, from flea bag to perinial weapon of choice for all police depts in the USA.
It is absolutely beyond me what it is that holds this from being fielded. Indeed BB could be dropping the ball as CEO and going out and playing. Yet when I see a Dazer on the table in a Brazilian Legislative session my sense is that there is something worthwhile to come. Why there are no viable verifications of delivery or use has me baffled. With all of that said I am still holding tight with my position. Not adding any until something gives when and what that is remains to be seen. A responsible PR and verification would have all of us in a better mood as concerns our investment. It is obvious that somebody is going to deliver the goods who and when are all that is in doubt. Come on Bob get your head out of your rect m and produce a verification.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
