InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Starnes

01/09/12 10:16 PM

#13856 RE: filmspeed #13855

It is not one bad report, it is two bad drilling PR'ed results; (Not mentioning the PPs at this point)..Yes, the first anomaly revealed a bad decision with an outer band being drilled instead of the central which represented the highest potential magnetic aerial readings....

It was initially explained by a Wolv IR that the anomaly could be compared to an octopus with the greatest concentration in the center but the arms represented extensions of the outcropping..All the money from the first drilling was spent drilling into a "tenticle" instead of in the middle "golden area". It flopped..

The last drilling attempts were proof that no lessons were learned from the first mistake.

The aerial views are beautiful but apparently are only being used to tease buyers (including PPs) as no "real" drilling has yet happened........

Now the PPs will be at .01 or lower based on these findings..Heavier dilution is inevitable at this point..