No Hoss, you are wrong.
""I am glad to see Rox get rid of even the newer TA for not living up to her performance expectations in a timely manner.""
A simple view of the court filings shows that is was a COURT ORDER that changed the TA, not Emax, AND it was due to the TA not following SEC TA standards, NOT because of Emax "performance expectations".
Now, how about those 2009 audited financials we were talking about last year. Are they still coming Hoss?