InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

longhorn 53

01/06/12 4:38 PM

#53560 RE: Sosa #53559

Thank you, my sentiments exactly.
icon url

Cougar6

01/06/12 4:55 PM

#53562 RE: Sosa #53559

As always, I am will be happy to read whatever is provided to the court as evidence. But so far, nothing has been provided by management that seems to substantiate their position.

icon url

HighRider

01/06/12 5:23 PM

#53567 RE: Sosa #53559

That's what you said last time and all we saw was a bunch of negative stuff about what the officers had done. How they tried to put through an independent director without proper vetting etc. We now see how they tried to railroad the election, in violation of COI and Bylaws. This should be interesting. Of course we won't know until the judge decides, but my guess is the former officers lose this one too.
icon url

downsideup

01/06/12 6:11 PM

#53579 RE: Sosa #53559

Ahhh. That explains the recent silence from management.

They've been busy writing memos.

icon url

123Money

01/07/12 12:10 PM

#53596 RE: Sosa #53559

Sosa, are you referring to the internal company records that management has failed to produce for the California cross-petition? Interesting that this information will be available for the Delaware case but could not be produced in California.