As always, I am will be happy to read whatever is provided to the court as evidence. But so far, nothing has been provided by management that seems to substantiate their position.
That's what you said last time and all we saw was a bunch of negative stuff about what the officers had done. How they tried to put through an independent director without proper vetting etc. We now see how they tried to railroad the election, in violation of COI and Bylaws. This should be interesting. Of course we won't know until the judge decides, but my guess is the former officers lose this one too.
Sosa, are you referring to the internal company records that management has failed to produce for the California cross-petition? Interesting that this information will be available for the Delaware case but could not be produced in California.