InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Pro-Truck 14

01/04/12 12:31 PM

#64266 RE: TOSCA #64265

Tosca,

in conversation with John, he mentioned to me that the lease with the original Pampana location was disolved,

I don't know if I misunderstood him, but I will call and reconfirm with him on it.

icon url

uksausage

01/04/12 1:13 PM

#64270 RE: TOSCA #64265

Didn't really explain from a geographic difference BUT I guess the Pampana North Property is just that - property a land mass (near the river) where the river once flowed, so allowing dry extraction and washing operations year around.

The North Pampana river must be dredging operations on the river when river height and flow rate allows.

Is this everyone's understanding? Anyone know the distance between the two (for logistics, supplies and security reasons)?