InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

longhorn 53

01/01/12 11:39 AM

#53314 RE: HighRider #53311

I did not mean to imply that you disrespected my views, only that I respected yours. Still friends? OK. I have been invested since 2009 so I'm like a sponge soaking it all up from ya'll, I mean you guys.
icon url

downsideup

01/01/12 9:07 PM

#53329 RE: HighRider #53311

Every prior "agreement" they've ever created has been a scam and a fraud... without any proper legal basis... with a purpose of defrauding not just the shareholders, but the courts, etc.

ZERO reason to expect this is any different... while those ignoring the history here, naturally should be expecting to have it repeated.

The current effort appears it is not different than others, save in one respect... that being the same as in Williams forcing them to address the frauds in the 2009 agreement...

IMO, they're going to be held to account... this time... and have run out of excuses now... and will not be let off the hook, as they were in 2007 by Turrini, and in 2009 by Williams.

There IS no "good faith" possible between Daic... and anyone... and that's just the nature of the beast. CLYW only a sliver in the history showing that is true.

Otherwise, you can expect the next effort to be "more of the same" with another effort in a P&D based on the fictional "assets" based on an "agreement" no one has ever seen... with that being another inducement to have the SEC remove the shares from the market... whether before or after the next "gotcha" they've planned to reveal the planned failures... all of which which they need to have happen to expect investors will surrender the fight for the REAL assets... which rightly belong to shareholders.