InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

NASCOW

01/01/12 12:49 AM

#5460 RE: wall_street61 #5459

Me & Moet agree with your logic, as always
icon url

loginusername

01/01/12 11:50 AM

#5462 RE: wall_street61 #5459

"even if this ruling is wrong, and that ruling is 21 for example, only wager what you are willing to lose as an appeal my not get you a real second bite because the court may not even take the appeal."

Now, that's useful information. Thanks.

I'm hoping my only decision next week will be whether to make a 2.25 sale or hold for higher. Class 18 or 21 will make for tougher decisions.
icon url

linda1

01/01/12 3:06 PM

#5463 RE: wall_street61 #5459




If you don't want to be quoted out of context then don't scramble your thought process.


I most certainly did read ALL of the Tranquility Opinion. And no I was not referring to the fact that the DIME LTWs were not issued by WMI.


I was referring to the fact that the LTWs are not connected to the purchase or sale of a security of the Debtor or its Affiliates. The LTWs were gifted as a dividend.



Class 12 - narrow interpretation of Section 510(b)


Class 18 - broad interpretation of Section 510(b)