InvestorsHub Logo

biolover

12/30/11 12:22 PM

#5560 RE: Kipperdo #5559

yup agree, 100%

Rymankoly

12/30/11 12:35 PM

#5561 RE: Kipperdo #5559

custom home versus pre-fab.



At current Real Estate market, you might want to look for another analogy.
Too many foreclosures......

And Kipperdo, you might think I'm out of line, but if you don't mind me asking what income level are you in and if you meet other patients of Fibrocell procedure, what level are they in ?

You right that it might take time for the market to learn, but if the price will stay so high (and we still don't know the profit split with the Dr. office), I don't see how can they make money.
Good Luck and Happy New year.

winduken

12/30/11 1:28 PM

#5565 RE: Kipperdo #5559

"custom home versus pre-fab. "

http://www.juvederm.com/Content/pdf/final-patient-labeling-ultra-xc.pdf
http://www.lavivpro.com/pdf/LAVIV-prescribing-info.pdf


If you read the clinical trial data, the value equation is simple and can be communicated to customers easily.

A Juvederm Ultra treatment starts out with a 1.9 improvement in a five-point wrinkle scale at 2 weeks, quickly decreases to 1.4 at 24 weeks (6 months) and down to 1.1 at 36 weeks (9 months). The treatment needs to be repeated shortly after that.

A laViv treatment shows a 2-point or higher improvement at 6 months or 24 weeks and stays that way or becomes better at 12 months. Various patients have reported that their look remains good for years without any repeat treatment.

No need to talk about Botox whose efficacy is not in the same class.