so am I, unless it is not, litton has been clammoring for disclosure but all the sudden silent, me i was passive, but now i'm concerned.
feelings suspicions go both ways, but at this point, they have made an appointment prior to proving the deal, neither of the new directors have publically stated that they were climbing on board because of the diac deal that i can recall (they may have and if they have i am sorry)
given that 3 out of 4 directors approved of the deal w/ drago but its not disclosed yet is a real burn on shareholders and is the same as the 2008 and 2009 deal when richard pattin failed shareholders,
drago worked his magic twice w/ richard, has humiliated williams, and now we are supposed to think he has not tried to up the anty on share holders
the progression has been
25% then 50% now 75% the next step is to take it all! desmond reid, kyle pierce, cristian turinni and now these two directors have failed us and are based on past history guilty untill proven innocent