InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

KZMike

12/22/11 10:04 AM

#9171 RE: kryrondoll #9166

I still believe the the time spent to court Intel for anything at this point is better spent on higher probable returns on that 'investment', RE post #9145. . . working on current negotiations or as you suggest Automotive is a much better/wiser option.

BORK has indicated [RE: Post 7329 also in sticky notes] their focus beyond Armor, will be in these three primary 'sectors' Electrical, Mining and Agriculture.

Having said that however, any 'surprise' developments that may arise from their current relationships will be pursued. A good example would be Pratt & Whitney and something they may help develop.

icon url

Proteeninjector

12/31/11 5:34 PM

#9342 RE: kryrondoll #9166

I agree also because manufacturers make money off of the fact that vehicles dont last forever and kryron would put a real damper on that. Instead, why dont us Ihubbers build an all kryron vehicle? advertise as the last vehicle you ever have to buy....that would never happen because the government would not allow our society to buy a product that you only have to purchase once..
Sorry, far fetched ranting going on, too much eggnog!