Replies to post #34310 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[TheEternalChampion]

Well I hope KBLB changes your mind Mojo. At least KBLB gives you somthing to do by way of hanging around it's chat boards. I know I myself dont stay somewhere I dont like, but hey, good for you to get something out of KBLB. I also say a person has to have some realistic point of view of whats an accomplishment or not, and to say a monkey could sign agreements with Notre Dame and Wyoming is totally skewed. Also to critique how long it took to get the SIAL deal done, when knowing that SIAL wanted to verify what KBLB was doing before working on ZFNs for them, I think that is a pompous and arragont statement. You give some credit for the SIAL deal (beause you say thats the only thing Kim has done) so then you have to give credit to the lab and its scientists because thats what SIAL saw when they agreed to let KBLB/Notre Dame work with the ZFNs and then you have to give credit to Kim choosing Dr. Fraser/ Notre Dame because if Kim wasn't working with such high regarded scientists that SIAL deal most likely wouldnt not exist. Also to make sure they were working with approval and not ripping of science from the University of Wyoming was a good thought to take care of too. Most crappy pennies dont care who they rip off. Not getting license agreements or approval for things are usually the kind of things that are found out by penny investors and that in turn sinks the ship. You see a stock that's down a couple cents from last Dec. I see a stock up at least 700% for over a year.

Go KBLB.

[kblbpatience]

All of this will be put to rest if/when revenues replace borrowing as the continuing financing of the company's developement. This is the one thing that I have my eye on like a laserbeam. This company, as a successful concern, is 100% dictated by whether that ever happens or not. It is the watershed issue, for me anyhow. I agree that the CSC situation is the one big caveat about this company, and is probably the biggest concern to any deep pocket, serious investor(s). I'm no scientist by anybody's definition (including wikipedia's, which we all seem to quote daily on this site), and frankly, in my opinion, it's great that we have people on this board that not only have an understanding of that science, but are generous enough to put the time in to explain it to folks like me. But, IMHO, all of it isn't going to mean much if the financing of this company isn't changed as soon as it can be done.

As for a forward split, call it a dividend, call it a split, call it whatever you want........I'll take extra shares just about anyday of the week. If ultimate success comes, moving the price a penny on 10 shares will prove to be much easier than moving the price a dime on 1 share.

Having said all that, I have strong doubts whether KBLB has done anything that the SEC would crush them over. If Manshoon could pinpoint something, I'd listen to him, but I don't think he has put his finger on anything specific yet, unless I missed it, and if he hasn't found anything real meaty out there, I strongly doubt it's there. Because I think we can all agree if Manshoon finds it, we're going to hear about it. At least I hope he'd share it. He's been damn good about sharing what he's found up to now, and personally, I thank him for that.

[Bucks4Buckeyes]

Hey, MOJO, I have been swing trading for 7 years, but I've only been trading pennies for about a year. In my research, I have run across quite a few shady "capital raising companies" with notorious names:

Asher Enterprises, Inc
PATB LLC
Monarch Media Fund LLC
OTC Capital Partners LLC

And quite a few others.

Could you please tell me the 'shady' part of Calm Seas Capital and any past 'shady' deals they have made with other companies?

Thanks for the input.

All The Best