Seton......if you were referring to my post, I think you'll see that I was indicating that a response might have been more forthcoming if one was to email the individuals in the know, regarding FASC and WRAP.
And those names were published several months ago, and noted again on my prior post.
I can see where Jagman might not get a quick response via a general email, when it could have been specifically directed as noted above.
Do you understand this?