InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Porgie Tirebiter

12/11/11 11:02 AM

#244750 RE: tom favata #244749

So the Fleming Island coup d'état attempt must mean that Quasar really does own the control block of NHSH's shares, and by default has control over Mineseeker Operations.

Mr. Kendrick has had his scam stolen, hasn't he?

When you swim with sharks, don't blame the sharks if you get eaten... It's just what comes naturally.
icon url

creapingman

12/11/11 11:52 AM

#244754 RE: tom favata #244749

If MS is in with NHSH why would either be involved with Q?

And this statement has me equally confused.

"2nd I am a friendly to mineseeker and a shareholder of QASP (I believe that this will be helpful if we are to get any value for QASP)."

Does this mean since you are on the temp BOD with DB, he does in fact have a relationship still ongoing with MS? He must have some that is not being divulged yet. Please shed more light on this.

And please, don't go saying value for Q. What more share swaps, money for Jeff's legal fund, what? How is this going to do a darn thing for Q?
icon url

texkengold

12/11/11 4:30 PM

#244762 RE: tom favata #244749

okay tom, lets try to clear up somthing for the shareholders.

1) you said you lost money for your clients by investing their money into qasp? and you said you repaid your clients losses out of your own pocket.

2) you said you held 100million shares of qasp at one point.
those 100M held shares by you.... were yours? or did they belong to clients?

easily you can see how folks are confused by your two statements.
so, if you think you are worthy to sit on a BOD please clear this matter up for us. seems you mixing the two issues together.
and possibly a stretch of your imigination, is it?
texkengold@yahoo.com
jmho