Replies to post #119592 on Bebida Beverage Company (BBDA)

[kidnova]

Company can't just sell shares because they feel like it.

LOL. You haven't been around pinksheets long have you?

[ToldYaSo]

Agreed, army!

Yes, the stock is down right now, but there are a bunch of stocks down big that past 6 months. This product is a "want" purchase, rather than a "need" purchase, and as the economy improves I believe we'll begin seeing even more sales increases.

BTW--welcome aboard as a mod!

[OlafKjelldsen]

I am seeing delivery from this CEO.

Really? Where? I see the CEO continuing to claim lots of things.

What about the last pr?

What about the enormous stack of hundreds of previous PRs that turned out to be complete BS? Why do you think that suddenly the PRs are going to be all true and all pan out as stated?

Looks like a delivery of Koma Undwind is in a shipping container by now heading across the pond my friend.

Looks to me like Brian Weber just made another meaningless claim in a PR. Based on his indisputable, proven, repeat history of putting out PRs that aren't true, I'm going to go ahead and presume this one is just more of the same.

In MHO things take time and money.

Absolutely. The more time goes by, the more money Brian Weber takes from people without delivering anything at all of value for shareholders.

Company has debt company sells shares to pay debt.

Usually a company sells products or services to pay its debt or it quickly figures out that it's not a viable company and stops fleecing people by asking them to pay its bills without any accountability for the money they take in.

Now when a company starts distribution to many other countries like BBDA is doing per the PR's. that = revenue.

There's probably not a heck of a lot of revenue coming from shipping cans of pop overseas, but they real key here is the phrase "per the PRs". I refer you once again to the enormous stack of PRs this company has issued over the years with similar claims, the vast majority of which turned out to be untrue.

revenue= no share holder dilution. no share holder dilution = increased PPS. Increased revenue the sky is the limit here with BBDA

Perhaps in an ideal world, but I really think you are just ignoring the dozens of red flags present with this stock and company. I can't be bothered to look up the exact figures, but this company once put out a financial statement claiming profitability and nearly a million $$$ sitting around and has sold hundreds of millions of shares since then. Maybe you should contact Brian Weber and share your idealistic formula with him because he clearly doesn't get the relationship between making money and paying his own bills. He still expects people to keep buying shares to pay his bills while he wastes the money on useless nonsense like NASCAR sponsorship and spendy music videos to promote products you can't get in stores.