V, can you update the IBOX to reflect that the TA terminated its relationship with the company in April of 2011.
If you want to add that there is no updated shareholder listing making a divy problematic, in the very, very, very and highly unlikely event, a divy is paid, that would be ok by me.
Claims of the IRS forcing investors to take tax write-off are completely incorrect.
Claims of brokers automatically notifying the IRS of complete losses for revoked stocks such as FFGO are completely incorrect.
Claims that revoked stocks do not qualify for dividends is completely incorrect.
Claims that the State of Incorporation do not govern what a company can do or not do at all times are incorrect (Just ask FINRA and the SEC).
Shorty wants IOU's and electronic markers closed out. He cannot cover by inducing selling since the stock's registration is currently revoked. So the only way he could "cover" is to induce write-offs for tax losses.
FFGO SHAREHOLDERS, BE ADVISED THAT THE NEITHER THE IRS NOR YOUR BROKER COULD FORCE YOU TO TAKE A TA WRITE-OFF FOR YOUR SHARES OF FFGO. CLAIMS OF SUCH ARE INCORRECT AND MISLEADING. CONTACT YOUR BROKER TO CONFIRM. BE ADVISED THAT THE SEC WARN INVESTORS OF UNKNOWN PARTIES MAKING UNVERIFIABLE CLAIMS. I CONFIRMED WITH MY BROKER WHO IS A VERIFIABLE PARTY!
the SEC advises shareholders of unknown parties posting emails and unverifiable opinions - puppydotcom
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
