InvestorsHub Logo

ohbull2000

12/08/11 6:47 AM

#145496 RE: CarltonH #145484

A couple of almost eloquent summaries this a.m. ...

my friend. You were correct yesterday, Tom's focus is complete. We talked and various paperwork items have been sent etc.

There is no reason to waste time rebutting here... End of Discussion!

Talk at ya later.

PureCaneSugar

12/08/11 7:02 AM

#145497 RE: CarltonH #145484

And the "clerical error" was never fixed.

Several obvious things here that should or could be corrected, clerical error fixed, BCIT cleared of revocation, DTCC lock lifted, SEC letter to Sec. Grassley corrected.

Hard to say if such trail of obvious correctable yet never corrected mistakes is malfeasance, incompetence, or fraud, but that so many try to turn a simple solution into some supposed insolvable mystery...


camper9

12/08/11 12:45 PM

#145597 RE: CarltonH #145484

At the time I was reading your post, the local radio station started playing this song. Coincidence? I think not.....


I have grown tired of the ridiculous nonsense posts

Things to remember when reading nonsense posts.

1. BCIT was the victim of a crime. It is no offence to be a victim of crime

2. TM did not know how to handle this and nor did anyone else.

3. TM turned to the SEC for assistance and for sweet FA.

4. The brokers sold at least 1.3 billion shares which they did not have.

5. The brokers have taken your money

6. The brokers have wilfully refused to deliver your shares

7. The decision to sue the shareholders was on the advice of the SEC and DTC.

8. The cusip number clerical error which prevented the company trading and led to it being de-listed cannot or will not be explained by FINRA.

9. The name change procedure was not completed by FINRA,

10. FINRA did not inform the company or other relevant parties that this name change had not been completed.

11. FINRA are unable or unwilling to explain why the name change did not get completed and why they did not advise the relevant parties.

12. Because of the actions of FINRA misleading statements were filed with the SEC

13. The DTC lock remained in force after the identified fake shares were ratified by the court case.

14. The combination of the global lock mean that although the company was still listed on the pink sheets it was in reality a none reporting grey public company.

15. Unable to generate income it could not keep paying the SEC fees for filing

16 The SEC revoked a company called Energy Source NOT Bancorp. There is nothing in those proceedings to say that ES was BCIT.

17. No fake shares have been identified or recovered since the aforementioned court case.

18 The fakes shares are now an irrelevance. All that matters is what is on the Transfer Agents register.

19. FINRA have stated in writng that despite the fact they are supposed to protect investors they have no responsibility to you who invested in BCIT.

Discussions about the controller on the certs, the restricted stamp, TM did this and TM did not do that, are LOB and simply efforts to distract you all from the truth of what has happened.

The brokers took your money and sold you shares they did not have.
SEC have failed you.
FINRA dont care about you and as for the DTCC.......