Sorry, but I do not understand the point to your post.
Like everyone here on this board, I have been learning about Klok, as the story unfolds. While the information coming out does not look good for his motives, I however, find it hard to believe he did this without the knowledge or cooperation of his management team. It seems so convenient for so many to place the blame solely on Klok, thus relieving themselves of any culpability or attention in the minds of regulators or investors who may have been defrauded; should it hit the fan.
Also, you seem to know a lot about Klok: would love to hear more about this knowledge you have. Please fill me in so I won't be "missing" it. Thank you.