InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Jeff5

12/03/11 11:04 AM

#22853 RE: nycdream #22852

We need a settlement now. Then when we take the next step and sue additional infringers, they will be forced to settle out of court, due to this precedent, thereby eliminating future cash drain for legal expenses. Smart to get this behind us, then go after POET. Settlements from all except ICM is fine with me. Let's bankrupt those d-bags....GLTA
icon url

DHOLE

12/03/11 12:05 PM

#22854 RE: nycdream #22852

I think that ICM Bankrupcy is more likely than one would believe from the AWESTRUCK commenters, Here on GERS. "Ethanol" producers have struggled, and several have failed in the recent past. Thankfully, the business, overall, seems to be improving. Greenshift has added a new Profit Factor which benefits all who Contract for it. And will sink those who do not. GERS, for those who don't pay attention, is out of the Ethanol Production Business except for Yorkville, which they need for experimentation and Research. If you consider where GERS derives Revenue, it is from the Patents. Their "Infastructure" is the Patents, which could be kept in a Cigar Box! Those, and the material and expense of Installations will soon be the "Cost of Revenue" when the Litigation is over. All the Blather about "Infastructure" going "POOOF" seem to ignore that "POOOF" is about $8 Million in paid off debt in the last year. BTW "Current Debt" is about $21 Million. So, anyone using $53 Million, $38 Million, $33 Million debt figures is doing so from either Ignorance, or to Deceive. Take your Pick. MOLPO